parsecvs repository moved...

parsecvs repository moved...

[Martin Langhoff]

I've just found that parsecvs.git repo has moved again... to
http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/repos/parsecvs.git

Used to be at
- git://git.freedesktop.org/~keithp/parsecvs
- git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/parsecvs

(I'm about to run a test import of Postgresql's CVS repo with it)

cheers,


martin

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Robin H. Johnson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:32:58PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>  I've just found that parsecvs.git repo has moved again... to
>  http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/repos/parsecvs.git
It seems to be broken on there?

$ git clone http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/repos/parsecvs.git
Initialized empty Git repository in /code/vcs/parsecvs/.git/
Cannot get remote repository information.
Perhaps git-update-server-info needs to be run there?

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 321 bytes --]

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Martin Langhoff]

On 4/16/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:32:58PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> >  I've just found that parsecvs.git repo has moved again... to
> >  http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/repos/parsecvs.git
> It seems to be broken on there?
>
> $ git clone http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/repos/parsecvs.git
> Initialized empty Git repository in /code/vcs/parsecvs/.git/
> Cannot get remote repository information.
> Perhaps git-update-server-info needs to be run there?

Oh - I managed to run an update to an existing checkout of mine - but
it's broken for cloning over http. I'm happy to publish my cloned repo
- try

 git-clone http://git.catalyst.net.nz/parsecvs.git

cheers,


martin

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Robin H. Johnson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 458 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 08:37:09PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>  Oh - I managed to run an update to an existing checkout of mine - but
>  it's broken for cloning over http. I'm happy to publish my cloned repo
>  - try
> 
>  git-clone http://git.catalyst.net.nz/parsecvs.git
Thanks.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 321 bytes --]

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Martin Langhoff]

On 4/16/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:

Hey - your MUA settings are weird - it sets the reply-to to the person
you've replied to. That's strange, and probably not what you want.
Reply-to should be to your preferred email address.

cheers,


martin

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Robin H. Johnson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 692 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 08:39:32PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>  On 4/16/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>  Hey - your MUA settings are weird - it sets the reply-to to the person
>  you've replied to. That's strange, and probably not what you want.
>  Reply-to should be to your preferred email address.
No, it's correct in this case. I have it configured to collapse any
occurrence of my address into the list address, because I'm subscribed
to the list, and prefer to not receive duplicates.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 321 bytes --]

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Martin Langhoff]

On 4/16/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> No, it's correct in this case. I have it configured to collapse any
> occurrence of my address into the list address, because I'm subscribed
> to the list, and prefer to not receive duplicates.

OTOH you _are_ breaking the reply / reply-all convention that most
people use and (almost) all MUAs handle correctly.

This means that I have a practical way to address you in private by
just hitting 'reply'. Most mailing-list-adept users will do that to
send you a private reply. It's pretty ackward that you are seeding the
reply-to with bogus addresses. I'd guess it'd bother me less if you
set the reply-to to /dev/null.

If you'd rather not receive duplicates, you can probably filter out
for duplicates in by message-id at your MUA/procmail.

> Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member

Oh, well. And I thought reply-to flamewars were exclusive to
debian-devel. They are silly enough there.

cheers.


m

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Martin Langhoff]

On 4/16/07, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you'd rather not receive duplicates, you can probably filter out
> for duplicates in by message-id at your MUA/procmail.

Actually - it's not a "probably" but a fact of life - look for
'duplicate' in the procmail quick-start guide:

     http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/

And a quick google tells me there are similar recipes for Exim and a
few other mail-related tools.

cheers,



martin

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Robin H. Johnson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2054 bytes --]

The entirety of the subject is not worth further discussion. Beyond this
email, let's get back to the point of this list guys: Git development!
The keyword expansion flame-war is more on topic :-P

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 08:51:13PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>  On 4/16/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > No, it's correct in this case. I have it configured to collapse any
> > occurrence of my address into the list address, because I'm subscribed
> > to the list, and prefer to not receive duplicates.
>  OTOH you _are_ breaking the reply / reply-all convention that most
>  people use and (almost) all MUAs handle correctly.
I turned off Mutt's followup_to for this list now.

Simply put, MUAs have been getting it wrong for so long, that the entire
thing is a minefield. The Procmail-Tips documentation
(http://pm-doc.sourceforge.net/pm-tips-body.html#replyto_header)
has perhaps one of the best summaries of it:
] The way to solve most reply problems is to encourage the responder to
] actually think about where the message needs to go, and make it easy for
] him to get the behavior he wants.
It's the entirely of do what I mean, not what I say. Is my mail a reply
or a followup? Is it brash enough that I should make sure it goes only
to the right person?

>  If you'd rather not receive duplicates, you can probably filter out
>  for duplicates in by message-id at your MUA/procmail.
If it weren't for broken MUAs, then yes, this would solve it. The best
implementations of this so far have been for uniques on the tuple of
(From, Message-ID, Subject[prefixes removed], Fuzzy body).

> > Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member
>  Oh, well. And I thought reply-to flamewars were exclusive to
>  debian-devel. They are silly enough there.
I'm not trying to start a flamewar, I get enough of those on gentoo-dev
already ;-).

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 321 bytes --]

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Junio C Hamano]

"Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> writes:

> On 4/16/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Hey - your MUA settings are weird - it sets the reply-to to the person
> you've replied to. That's strange, and probably not what you want.
> Reply-to should be to your preferred email address.
>
> cheers,

Look at Robin's header again.  It is pointing other people with
Mail-followup-to: header.

People do that to avoid getting duplicates from mailing list,
without realizing how rude that practice is.  It forces people
who want to address THEM specifically (as opposed to "other
people") spend extra seconds correcting the e-mail header.

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Martin Langhoff]

On 4/16/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> Look at Robin's header again.  It is pointing other people with
> Mail-followup-to: header.

Don't worry -- I did ;-) and I did remember your complaint a few hs ago.

> People do that to avoid getting duplicates from mailing list,
> without realizing how rude that practice is.  It forces people
> who want to address THEM specifically (as opposed to "other
> people") spend extra seconds correcting the e-mail header.

Yeah -- and the fun thing is that you can get caught with a nasty
gaffe if you hit reply and send of what you think is a private
reply... and ends up going to the list.

Mbwa-ha-ha, watch those flamewars start. Not.

Let's use the reply-to as it's meant to be ;-)

cheers,


martin

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[James Cloos]

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> writes:

Martin> I've just found that parsecvs.git repo has moved again... to
Martin> http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/repos/parsecvs.git

Martin> Used to be at
Martin> - git://git.freedesktop.org/~keithp/parsecvs
Martin> - git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/parsecvs

The version at /git/users/keithp/repos/parsecvs.git shows its most
recent commit at Sat Sep 9 15:07:11 2006 -0700.

The version at ~keithp/parsecvs.git shows its most recent commit
at Wed Apr 4 21:35:23 2007 -0700.

(In each case for the master branch.  Both have master, master-old,
merge-flat and rcs-builtin branches.)

So it looks like git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/parsecvs is
the current version.

I don't see any way to access that repo over http, though.  Only
via git-daemon.

The gitweb URL is:

http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=users/keithp/parsecvs.git

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

Re: parsecvs repository moved...

[Petr Baudis]

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:21:30PM CEST, James Cloos wrote:
> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> Martin> I've just found that parsecvs.git repo has moved again... to
> Martin> http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/repos/parsecvs.git
> 
> Martin> Used to be at
> Martin> - git://git.freedesktop.org/~keithp/parsecvs
> Martin> - git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/users/keithp/parsecvs
> 
> The version at /git/users/keithp/repos/parsecvs.git shows its most
> recent commit at Sat Sep 9 15:07:11 2006 -0700.
> 
> The version at ~keithp/parsecvs.git shows its most recent commit
> at Wed Apr 4 21:35:23 2007 -0700.
> 
> (In each case for the master branch.  Both have master, master-old,
> merge-flat and rcs-builtin branches.)
> 
> So it looks like git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/parsecvs is
> the current version.
> 
> I don't see any way to access that repo over http, though.  Only
> via git-daemon.

Maybe would be best to set up a repo.or.cz mirror and keep it pointed to
the latest URL of the repository? :-)

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Ever try. Ever fail. No matter. // Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
		-- Samuel Beckett