From: "Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
To: "Panagiotis Issaris" <takis.issaris@uhasselt.be>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FFmpeg considering GIT
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:48:03 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46a038f90705021848w3d3b8f6pdbd100e8419f1b74@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20070502T111026-882@post.gmane.org>
On 5/2/07, Panagiotis Issaris <takis.issaris@uhasselt.be> wrote:
> The questions are stated in this e-mail [1]. One of the things that are being
> discussed is the following action on a publicly mirrored repository:
> git branch -m master dead_end
> git branch -m last_good master
>
> I'd think this would fail as people could have pulled from the repository while
> the "dead_end" commit was already available, right?
Yes - that's something you shouldn't do on a normal branch... but
that's a feature ;-) -- we call it re-winding a branch.
A good workaround if you expect to go down some dead_ends is to have
an experimental branch that you pre-announce that will be rewound
regularly. On the git repo, Junio does exactly that with "pu"
("proposed updates"), and several feature-development branches have
been dropped or rewound at times.
Now, for your main dev and various maintenance branches, just do a
revert. If something made it into the main dev branch it means it's
not so experimental anymore and all the developers are building
further development on top. At that stage, the potential mistake has
made it "quite far" so you can't rewind it and pretend it didn't exist
;-)
So the good practice is to never rewind the long-term branches people
base their work on. Branches in your repo, and public branches clearly
marked as experimental, anything goes.
cheers,
martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-03 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 9:29 FFmpeg considering GIT Panagiotis Issaris
2007-05-02 23:48 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-03 1:03 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-04 0:42 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-04 7:21 ` [RFC?] Telling git about more complex relationships between commits (Was: Re: FFmpeg considering GIT) Johan Herland
2007-05-04 9:36 ` Alex Riesen
2007-05-04 11:39 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-04 12:06 ` Andrew Ruder
2007-05-04 12:30 ` Johan Herland
2007-05-04 11:53 ` Johan Herland
2007-05-04 22:11 ` Alex Riesen
2007-05-05 12:49 ` Johan Herland
2007-05-05 18:03 ` Alex Riesen
2007-05-05 16:13 ` Johan Herland
2007-05-04 11:10 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-04 12:22 ` Johan Herland
2007-05-03 1:48 ` Martin Langhoff [this message]
2007-05-03 18:00 ` FFmpeg considering GIT Uwe Kleine-König
2007-05-03 20:00 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-03 20:05 ` david
2007-05-03 20:13 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-04 13:46 ` Michael Niedermayer
2007-05-04 15:53 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-04 16:09 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-05-04 17:23 ` Florian Weimer
2007-05-04 16:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-04 18:17 ` Carl Worth
2007-05-04 18:25 ` Johan Herland
2007-05-04 20:24 ` Michael Niedermayer
2007-05-05 4:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-05 13:35 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-05 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-05 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-05 22:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-06 7:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-07 12:13 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-05-07 12:30 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-07 12:50 ` Johan Herland
2007-05-07 12:56 ` Alex Riesen
2007-05-08 6:30 ` Marco Costalba
2007-05-09 4:28 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-05-09 6:38 ` Marco Costalba
2007-05-09 18:17 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-09 18:28 ` Jan Hudec
2007-05-09 21:09 ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2007-05-09 21:36 ` Jan Hudec
2007-05-10 11:20 ` Marco Costalba
2007-05-10 16:52 ` Jan Hudec
2007-05-07 17:52 ` Jan Hudec
2007-05-07 22:10 ` Gábor Farkas
2007-05-07 23:21 ` Randal L. Schwartz
[not found] ` <fcaeb9bf0705080707x7ad28afelf98ecd93276042d1@mail.gmail.com>
2007-05-08 15:53 ` Gábor Farkas
2007-05-07 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-08 2:03 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-08 7:26 ` Jeff King
2007-05-06 7:56 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-06 10:19 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-06 16:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-06 8:15 ` Marco Costalba
2007-05-06 11:14 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-06 12:19 ` Marco Costalba
2007-05-06 12:33 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-06 12:33 ` Marco Costalba
2007-05-06 12:59 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-06 13:03 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-09 22:30 ` Pavel Roskin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-08 3:39 Brett Schwarz
2007-05-08 4:06 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-05-08 4:19 ` Shawn O. Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46a038f90705021848w3d3b8f6pdbd100e8419f1b74@mail.gmail.com \
--to=martin.langhoff@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=takis.issaris@uhasselt.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).