From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin Langhoff" Subject: Re: Git and Scmbug integration Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:08:04 +1300 Message-ID: <46a038f90711132208r4daf477cle54f2feb95852cdb@mail.gmail.com> References: <1194980792.4106.6.camel@localhost> <1194998142.4106.24.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David Symonds" , jnareb@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, scmbug-users@lists.mkgnu.net To: "Kristis Makris" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 14 07:08:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IsBQm-0000nD-DK for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:08:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752389AbXKNGIK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:08:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750779AbXKNGIJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:08:09 -0500 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]:37167 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750759AbXKNGIG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:08:06 -0500 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b36so12522ana for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:08:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=YylsWpqWC9eR/hf9FXAts8+p4Q1Y3/h/iD78C9eu/EQ=; b=jcv15alXdfdTg8LvVtpgV/bTQzcSAVHRHbvARRdlY3SQ72FS/XfOq68V+2luCzxVL6nUM5bQa+bR5FjYU94hgvtAseGqbwR9CvZaxeAbz1wkInhlxD7OHiHmdhiBTk+jR5KGGsdITESzZV2vEAOux1KRxKfPgobCINbaMZDTFik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OGNblp2U/GWAH858Gja3yPVQLYjh4M1SeA31KRM7PVx7SOviOH3Hx3fBRhGHSUGHQ+tghkUpjxouelDMHmVJyJyRocWg09FnHlmyEfdHub+E1zIiRtd3Wi2MonjLA20A0DfXXhHycdqqIzj4jJ1NOuayL5t9qNs9S//LcSyxNU0= Received: by 10.100.31.3 with SMTP id e3mr11017158ane.1195020484679; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.228.13 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:08:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1194998142.4106.24.camel@localhost> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Nov 14, 2007 12:55 PM, Kristis Makris wrote: > It isn't a centralized bug-tracking system necessarily. Because > different developers may used different, custom bug-tracking systems, > with custom hooks in their own local Git repositories that integrate > with only their own bug-tracking systems. And perhaps we can add the > support in the Scmbug Git frontend to integrate with a centralized > bug-tracker only on push operations if desired. I disagree somewhat here. In git, local commits are extremely lightweight, and as a developer I don't want anything remarkable to happen on those, even locally. It's pushing (which is actually publishing!) that makes those commits relevant. Even if I have a local or distributed bugtracker, any purely local commit is "draft". And this is regardless of centralised or distributed -- that's a matter of policy around the repo I'm pushing to. The distinction that matters is local vs published. Local commits get removed, rebased, redone, discarded a whole lot. > But we can't explore any of these issues, discussed in the thread below > too, unless we can extract what's needed from the hooks. I concur with the chorus that chants "HEAD"... try with `git show HEAD` for starters... cheers, martin