Re: git-cvsexportcommit fails for huge commits

["Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>]

On Dec 12, 2007 9:31 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> We will make our commits
> in two CVS invocations, but since CVS isn't atomic _anyway_, we
> shouldn't mind losing the atomicity.

Quick note -- I used to understand that cvs was not atomic, but
reading the on-the-wire protocol has taught me otherwise. Modern
versions of cvs are actually quite atomic-ish -- the protocol expects
the client to give all the relevant data to the server, and then say
"yep, that was all", and only _then_ the server does its commit.

So if the client dies or cancels along the way, nothing ever happens
on the server side.

Still, I suspect that the _server_ is not atomic, so if the server
process dies or finds a problem along the way, you could end up with a
half-commit in the repository, and maybe some hosed ,v files.

IOWs, the protocol *is* atomic, and this patch does make things
slightly more brittle. Perhaps require an option to be set before we
do this?


m