From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin Langhoff" Subject: Re: Monotone workflow compared to Git workflow ( was RE: Git vs Monotone) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:43:48 +1200 Message-ID: <46a038f90807311443q2bbf7782kbbf339ab77376dc7@mail.gmail.com> References: <63BEA5E623E09F4D92233FB12A9F79430238A5EE@emailmn.mqsoftware.com> <20080731205400.GA7911@atjola.homenet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Craig L. Ching" , sverre@rabbelier.nl, "Git Mailinglist" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Steinbrink?=" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 31 23:44:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOfx8-0001ME-Fz for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:44:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754253AbYGaVnw convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:43:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754491AbYGaVnv (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:43:51 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.176]:47770 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753569AbYGaVnu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:43:50 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so436548pyb.10 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:43:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=uWqWWM50Tc5XbYVlk+7n3xx21J9Szba4GSSVxWlt2gs=; b=Mb6L4HelaiXrnu7u4G4yvfNkNN4A7xplmouUGzPbC0BOAGMmVCs7jcN/aYRQok1DC5 U+7RmpISUg0/3zWshNeVrR0vO4fnTz8Y86BrcAAldbEP3QbVUwz0Jqus32DBLLn/x6CX facIcBaQRzG2bZydtwwIWobR89zAGbGrIaKEo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=g/sSddqyPctZnkUvnpBcajwcuJJRWe1wRQ9vfidXevkmp9dKrOsAPbj7Hueg4kdvqG y+YqeKHf8jr2oQcjGAkm9JlyiAVVdtGw8N+xgxVpyMckIq1e4NHk2WC+vr8/HCGMJPH6 INbJulhiOjfeuOeW2mVYyDu5cxvRPbWsVWVjw= Received: by 10.142.163.13 with SMTP id l13mr3459589wfe.34.1217540628575; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.43.6 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:43:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080731205400.GA7911@atjola.homenet> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Bj=F6rn Steinbrink wrote: >> So literally, if you do >> >> git clone > > Hum, I guess I'm just missing something and prepare to get flamed, bu= t > wouldn't you want that one to be bare? Otherwise, the other clones wo= n't > see all of the original repo's branches, right? Yes, that's why git clone --reference /path/to/fat/checkout/.git/ is far better. Each "thin" checkout sees the central repo normally, but they borrow the object store from the referenced local "fat" checkout. cheers, m --=20 martin.langhoff@gmail.com martin@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff