From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Christian MICHON" Subject: Re: MinGW port usable Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:08:59 +0100 Message-ID: <46d6db660701291508m4362eedchd4050e61f4989a92@mail.gmail.com> References: <200701292320.43888.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Johannes Sixt" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Linus Torvalds" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 30 00:09:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HBfcY-0006UM-2d for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:09:06 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932833AbXA2XJB (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:09:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932845AbXA2XJB (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:09:01 -0500 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]:15939 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932833AbXA2XJA (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:09:00 -0500 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so802705ana for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:09:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=R7P42EHIekPXs3PnfBx5hLYap2BsyGE/6urheOObwChLPwl/L6l4J0fxQ90o98bi9jVEndw7DTh+gtcJBOx8AYhQujzh7qhoJSsGSZw5VCXHXYil09N0FJSaGHMC4OrdMVW+RZRkeMq6e7eXbeZdm0XsbzMo75k6XDc0LoZV6io= Received: by 10.114.190.6 with SMTP id n6mr311267waf.1170112139583; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:08:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.16.9 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:08:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 1/29/07, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Can you elaborate about any performance differences, especially with > cygwin? Does this make git perform reasonably on Windows, or are the > performance problems as bad as with cygwin? > I do not know about cygwin recently (else than it was slow), but I cloned my packed git repository of all 117 2.6 linux kernels and the "git diff" rocks on it. git-unpack and git-repack was slow as hell, though. Maybe this is the part to be improved. Mostly bad I/Os... > gitk really shouldn't use either. It should probably use > > git-show-ref -h -d > > instead, which has the same output format (modulo a space vs tab issue), > and is entirely local, with no silly unnecessary remote connext. > > Something like this patch. > > Does that work on mingw too? > I'll try that tomorrow, but you'll have other reporting about it, for sure. -- Christian