From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fork/exec removal series Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:07:51 +0200 Message-ID: <47009CC7.70300@viscovery.net> References: <1191183001-5368-1-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <200709302334.37129.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 01 09:08:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IcFNu-0005Sl-7L for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:08:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751496AbXJAHH6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 03:07:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751341AbXJAHH6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 03:07:58 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:23880 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751314AbXJAHH5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 03:07:57 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1IcFNf-0008Ss-Vl; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:07:52 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.42] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E1B546; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:07:52 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin schrieb: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> These cases I hope to be able to treat as "coroutine": >> >> - sideband demultiplexer in builtin-fetch-pack.c >> - internal rev-list in upload-pack >> - the two-way pipe handling in convert.c and builtin-upload-archive.c >> >> There are probably more in daemon.c and imap-send.c. >> >> BTW, the convert.c case (apply_filter) is most interesting for me, since I >> have a real-world use-case for a clean-filter. > > Calling it coroutine is interesting... But yes, I agree that these three > cases cannot be handled otherwise. Suggestions for a better name are appreciated! -- Hannes