From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: [PATCH] gitk: Do not pick up file names of "copy from" lines Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:21:00 +0200 Message-ID: <470253CC.8040305@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: Paul Mackerras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 02 16:21:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Icicc-0007Cu-2R for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:21:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752462AbXJBOVJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:21:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752454AbXJBOVI (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:21:08 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:9373 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752405AbXJBOVH (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:21:07 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1IcicP-0001bZ-Oz; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:21:02 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.42] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47BE54D; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:21:00 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: A file copy would be detected only if the original file was modified in the same commit. This implies that there will be a patch listed under the original file name, and we would expect that clicking the original file name in the file list warps the patch window to that file's patch. (If the original file was not modified, the copy would not be detected in the first place, the copied file would be listed as "new file", and this whole matter would not apply.) However, if the name of the copy is sorted after the original file's patch, then the logic introduced by commit d1cb298b0b (which picks up the link information from the "copy from" line) would overwrite the link information that is already present for the original file name, which was parsed earlier. Hence, this patch reverts part of said commit. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt --- gitk | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gitk b/gitk index b3ca704..1306382 100755 --- a/gitk +++ b/gitk @@ -5216,8 +5216,7 @@ proc getblobdiffline {bdf ids} { set diffinhdr 0 } elseif {$diffinhdr} { - if {![string compare -length 12 "rename from " $line] || - ![string compare -length 10 "copy from " $line]} { + if {![string compare -length 12 "rename from " $line]} { set fname [string range $line [expr 6 + [string first " from " $line] ] end] if {[string index $fname 0] eq "\""} { set fname [lindex $fname 0] -- 1.5.3.716.gb8ce0-dirty