From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make git-clean a builtin Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:37:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4709D027.3090003@viscovery.net> References: <11917040461528-git-send-email-shawn.bohrer@gmail.com> <20071008020435.GA20050@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20071008022205.GA21277@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Shawn Bohrer , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 08 08:37:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IemFL-0006xC-1V for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:37:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752378AbXJHGhd (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:37:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752467AbXJHGhd (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:37:33 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:51344 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752378AbXJHGhd (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:37:33 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1IemEz-0007ei-V4; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:37:22 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.42] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B7454D; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:37:27 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <20071008022205.GA21277@coredump.intra.peff.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King schrieb: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 07:17:50PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> fchdir() is not portable. > > I was using the "even Solaris has it!" test, but yes, it's not POSIX. I > don't know how common it actually is (for curiosity's sake, do you know > of a common platform that lacks it?). Windows. ;) -- Hannes