git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
To: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>,
	Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolete binary files
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:27:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4709F805.8050704@op5.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071008010648.GB29433@potapov>

Dmitry Potapov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 06:22:28PM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
>> git-filter-branch --tree-filter 'rm -f testme.txt' HEAD
>> git reset --hard
>> rm -rf .git/refs/original/
>> vi .git/packed-refs
>> # Use vi to remove the line referring to refs/original...
>> git reflog expire --all --expire-unreachable=0
>> git gc --prune
>>
>> Seems like a wrapper is needed.  :-)
> 
> Actually, I would rather not, because you rarely need to remove anything
> immediately, and 30 days delay is reasonable time to give you a chance
> to recover that you removed accidentally. You can reduce it by setting
> appropriate value for gc.reflogExpireUnreachable in your configuration.
> The only thing you need to do is to remove .git/refs/original/heads/something
> after you are sure that git-filter-branch did exactly what you wanted.
> 
>>> Warning: all unreachable references will be removed!
>> What other scenarios could lead to unreachable references?
> 
> Any re-writing of history leads to that.
> 

git-rebase being the most common culprit, right alongside 'git commit --amend'.

>> I don't
>> know how to determine whether this is safe or not (except that these
>> were test repositories anyway, so I don't care what happens to them).
> 
> Git logs all your action, so even re-writing history would not be
> so disastrous if you suddenly realized that you did something wrong.
> The history is stored for 30 days by default. Usually, you do not
> need to mess with Git internals like you did above. Your useless
> files still will disappear after being unreachable for 30 days.
> 
> OTOH, if you want to have a clean repository immediately, I believe
> 'git clone' is a better option. After you made a local clone using
> it, 'git gc' should remove old garbage.
> 

A clone only fetches revs reachable from a ref, so pruning immediately
after a clone is completely pointless.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-08  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-07 21:23 Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolete binary files Elijah Newren
2007-10-07 21:38 ` Frank Lichtenheld
2007-10-07 22:00   ` Elijah Newren
2007-10-07 22:19     ` Alex Riesen
2007-10-07 22:24       ` Elijah Newren
2007-10-07 23:40         ` Alex Riesen
2007-10-08  0:09           ` Elijah Newren
2007-10-08  6:15             ` Alex Riesen
2007-10-08  9:23               ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-10-07 23:43         ` Dmitry Potapov
2007-10-08  0:22           ` Elijah Newren
2007-10-08  1:06             ` Dmitry Potapov
2007-10-08  9:27               ` Andreas Ericsson [this message]
2007-10-08 10:05                 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-10-08 12:40                 ` Dmitry Potapov
2007-10-08 13:01                   ` Karl Hasselström
2007-10-07 23:19     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-07 23:24       ` Elijah Newren
2007-10-07 23:28         ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-07 23:38           ` Elijah Newren
2007-10-08  0:34             ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-08  0:47               ` Elijah Newren
2007-10-08  2:28                 ` Sam Vilain
2007-10-08  1:00               ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-08  1:06                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-08  6:22                   ` Johannes Sixt
2007-10-08 14:36                     ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-08 16:37                       ` Theodore Tso
2007-10-08 19:05                         ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-09 10:37                         ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-07 22:08 ` Alex Riesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4709F805.8050704@op5.se \
    --to=ae@op5.se \
    --cc=dpotapov@gmail.com \
    --cc=frank@lichtenheld.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).