git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
To: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Cc: Scott Parish <sRp@srparish.net>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] execv_git_cmd(): also try PATH if everything else fails.
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:12:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <471DD703.70608@op5.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471CC380.5030603@viscovery.net>

Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Andreas Ericsson schrieb:
>> Scott Parish wrote:
>>> I'm tempted to try a different approach. What if instead of looping
>>> and building up strings of all the different absolute paths we want
>>> to try we just prepend to PATH with the correct extra precedence,
>>> and then call execvp on the command we want?
>>>
>>
>> That's how the original git --exec-dir feature got implemented. 
>> There's even a nifty function for it in git.c; prepend_to_path(). It's 
>> a provably workable solution.
> 
> The reason that this was done is for the sake of shell scripts: They 
> need to have the path that was finally decided as exec-path in $PATH.
> 
> But I can't think of any negative side effect if *all* exec-path 
> candidates are in $PATH. It's important, though, that all paths are 
> absolute because the tools chdir every now and then.
> 

So long as they're added in "success:failed:failed" order, I don't see
any issues either. Assuming we stop prepending once we find something
that works, that should be a non-issue.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-23 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-20  8:12 [PATCH] When exec'ing sub-commands, fall back on execvp (thePATH) Scott R Parish
2007-10-20 20:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-20 20:57 ` Scott Parish
2007-10-20 22:00   ` [PATCH] execv_git_cmd(): also try PATH if everything else fails Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-21  2:36     ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-21 21:59       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-22  4:21         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-22 10:35           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-23  4:34             ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-23 11:12               ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-22 14:36         ` Scott Parish
2007-10-22 15:19           ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-10-22 15:36             ` Johannes Sixt
2007-10-23 11:12               ` Andreas Ericsson [this message]
2007-10-23 15:29                 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-10-21 18:21     ` Scott Parish
2007-10-21 22:02       ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=471DD703.70608@op5.se \
    --to=ae@op5.se \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    --cc=sRp@srparish.net \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).