From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark 'git stash [message...]' as deprecated Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:00:43 +0100 Message-ID: <473170AB.7030104@viscovery.net> References: <20071106085134.GD4435@artemis.corp> <1194395205-27905-1-git-send-email-bdowning@lavos.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , tsuna@lrde.epita.fr, aghilesk@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Brian Downing X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 07 09:01:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpfqR-0005IX-8O for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:01:03 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756447AbXKGIAs (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 03:00:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756319AbXKGIAs (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 03:00:48 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:35898 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752032AbXKGIAs (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 03:00:48 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1Ipfpg-0004I0-Sl; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:00:17 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1BD69F; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 09:00:43 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <1194395205-27905-1-git-send-email-bdowning@lavos.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_95=3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Brian Downing schrieb: > Complain to STDERR unless 'git stash save' is explicitly used. > This is in preparation for completely disabling the "default save" > behavior of the command in the future. > > ... > -'git-stash' [save] [message...] > +'git-stash' save [message...] Can't we have these two? git-stash git-stash save [message...] 'git stash' without a message as an equivalent of 'git stash save' is still very handy. -- Hannes