From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bisect visualize: use "for-each-ref" to list all good refs. Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:05:50 +0100 Message-ID: <473AC87E.90107@viscovery.net> References: <20071114055036.2c5ae793.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <7voddxkzzw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christian Couder , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 14 11:06:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IsF8O-0006md-NX for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:06:13 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752377AbXKNKFy (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:05:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752349AbXKNKFx (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:05:53 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:6037 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752211AbXKNKFx (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:05:53 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1IsF7W-0002ly-QI; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:05:19 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69C36B7; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:05:50 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <7voddxkzzw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano schrieb: > Even worse is that bisect_clean_state uses > > rm -fr "$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect" > > so if you ever pack your refs in the middle of bisection and > then clean the state, you will still carry the old good set of > commits that are somewhat hard to cull. Heh. I think I'd done this once, and couldn't get rid of those refs with 'git-bisect reset'. Now I know why. -- Hannes