From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Cosmetic git-am interactive bug
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:19:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4755A836.1050408@garzik.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 999 bytes --]
Just now, I was exploring git-am's interactive mode, so as to comply
with Linus's urgings of a cleaner changelog <grin>. I had a raw email
changelog with the subject
Re: 2.6.24-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
I used the [e]dit feature of interactive mode to change this
first-line/one-line summary to
pata_amd/pata_via: de-couple programming of PIO/MWDMA and UDMA
timings
When I hit [y]es to apply the patch, git reported
Applying 2.6.24-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
Wrote tree 34cebd48e3b4e90fe3e6a6c6c03154ae1ed0c827
Committed: 943547abdfe9b4e27e36a25987909619908dffbf
The use of the older one-line summary led me to believe that it had not
committed my changelog edits. Looking at the result, however, proved
that the commit changelog was my new, corrected version.
Thus, I concluded that the printing of the old-and-no-longer-valid
changelog during the commit-to-tree phase was a bug.
Please see attached file for full example.
Thanks,
Jeff
[-- Attachment #2: git-am.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3166 bytes --]
[jgarzik@pretzel libata-dev]$ git-am --utf8 --signoff -i /g/tmp/mbox
Commit Body is:
--------------------------
2.6.24-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Saturday 01 December 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Subject : 2.6.24-rc1: pata_amd fails to detect 80-pin wire
> Submitter : "Thomas Lindroth" <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com>
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/7/152
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9322
> Handled-By : Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/11/115
Tejun's rework of cable detection code which fixes the problem has
been just applied into "upstream" (not "upstream-fixes") so it is
destined for 2.6.25 (I wasn't on cc: BTW) and since I got no feedback
on my patch (below) which also happens to fix the regression, was
acked by Alan, tested by Thomas and has been in -mm for 3 weeks now
I assume that everybody is happy with it (Jeff/Tejun: you were also
on cc: when the patch was merged into -mm)...
Linus, please apply.
[PATCH] pata_amd/pata_via: de-couple programming of PIO/MWDMA and UDMA timings
* Don't program UDMA timings when programming PIO or MWDMA modes.
This has also a nice side-effect of fixing regression added by commit
681c80b5d96076f447e8101ac4325c82d8dce508 ("libata: correct handling of
SRST reset sequences") (->set_piomode method for PIO0 is called before
->cable_detect method which checks UDMA timings to get the cable type).
* Bump driver version.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Tested-by: "Thomas Lindroth" <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
--------------------------
Apply? [y]es/[n]o/[e]dit/[v]iew patch/[a]ccept all e
Commit Body is:
--------------------------
pata_amd/pata_via: de-couple programming of PIO/MWDMA and UDMA timings
* Don't program UDMA timings when programming PIO or MWDMA modes.
This has also a nice side-effect of fixing regression added by commit
681c80b5d96076f447e8101ac4325c82d8dce508 ("libata: correct handling of
SRST reset sequences") (->set_piomode method for PIO0 is called before
->cable_detect method which checks UDMA timings to get the cable type).
* Bump driver version.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Tested-by: "Thomas Lindroth" <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
--------------------------
Apply? [y]es/[n]o/[e]dit/[v]iew patch/[a]ccept all y
Applying 2.6.24-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
Wrote tree 34cebd48e3b4e90fe3e6a6c6c03154ae1ed0c827
Committed: 943547abdfe9b4e27e36a25987909619908dffbf
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-04 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-04 19:19 Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-12-05 7:01 ` Cosmetic git-am interactive bug Junio C Hamano
2007-12-05 23:58 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4755A836.1050408@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).