From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pascal Obry Subject: Re: how to create v2 patch Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:38:14 +0100 Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net Message-ID: <47586BC6.2020100@obry.net> References: <47515693.9070405@imap.cc> <47515EF3.8010507@obry.net> <20071201134321.GA10997@glandium.org> <475855D6.201@imap.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Mike Hommey , git@vger.kernel.org To: Tilman Schmidt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 06 22:38:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0OQf-0000I8-OQ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:38:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751936AbXLFViU convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:38:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752356AbXLFViU (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:38:20 -0500 Received: from smtp21.orange.fr ([80.12.242.48]:61626 "EHLO smtp21.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751696AbXLFViT (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:38:19 -0500 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2116.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4B2011C0009F for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:38:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (AVelizy-151-1-88-105.w86-205.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.205.126.105]) by mwinf2116.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 057931C00086; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:38:16 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20071206213817224.057931C00086@mwinf2116.orange.fr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: <475855D6.201@imap.cc> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Tilman Schmidt a =E9crit : > Hmm. But wouldn't each of these approaches lead to my original > commit being removed from my git repository? And isn't removing > commits that have already been published strongly discouraged? They won't be removed, just changed/merged... and that's what you were looking for or I did not understand your question! This is not bad practice as it is done on YOUR repository. Of course this should never be done on a pushed/published changeset. Pascal. --=20 --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595