From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Have a flag to stop the option parsing at the first argument. Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:13:56 +0100 Message-ID: <47669234.7020202@viscovery.net> References: <20071217095014.GF7453@artemis.madism.org> <30351C09-8BED-4D81-ABDD-2E079B4D54D2@wincent.com> <20071217114703.GH7453@artemis.madism.org> <3CF3CEA5-72F1-47D1-ADB9-37F5C2E292A8@wincent.com> <26962818-F702-44D2-BD26-95D74CE21F0D@wincent.com> <223E3B44-92DA-4861-83D6-67E56F70E784@wincent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Pierre Habouzit , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Wincent Colaiuta X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 17 16:15:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J4Hfk-0003Ep-Eq for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:14:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754640AbXLQPOB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:14:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754564AbXLQPOB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:14:01 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:26689 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752586AbXLQPOA (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:14:00 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1J4HfZ-0000ki-AS; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:14:13 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C36546; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:13:56 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <223E3B44-92DA-4861-83D6-67E56F70E784@wincent.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Wincent Colaiuta schrieb: > But leaving -p aside, will you oppose any patches that make it possible > for people to write stuff like: > > git init --bare > > Personally, I think this is an obvious usability improvement worth > striving for. Given that "git --bare init" will continue to work under > what I'm proposing, I really can't see any worthwhile argument against > it. Because we're talking about a UI improvement for newcomers at no > cost to old timers. Your point. I hate to have to think hard each time whether it's "git --bare init" or "git init --bare" and "git clone --bare" or "git --bare clone" and wouldn't mind if I no longer needed to. -- Hannes