From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add format-patch option --no-name-prefix. Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:54:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4767ED52.9010004@viscovery.net> References: <1197992574-3464-1-git-send-email-pascal@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, pascal@obry.net To: Pascal Obry X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 18 16:55:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J4emy-0005N5-6s for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:55:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755758AbXLRPzB (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:55:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755665AbXLRPzB (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:55:01 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:44600 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754518AbXLRPzA (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:55:00 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1J4emo-0005bR-HR; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:55:14 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DF654D; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:54:58 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <1197992574-3464-1-git-send-email-pascal@obry.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pascal Obry schrieb: > This option can be used to generate a patch file > where file names are relative to the Git root > directory. Such a patch can then be applied with > the standard patch tool using option -p0. While I've always wondered what the a/ and b/ prefixes were good for (and I still do), I also wonder what's so different between typing patch -p0 and patch -p1 that we need another diff option for it. Ok, on my keyboard 0 is typed with the right hand, and 1 with the left hand, but... ?? -- Hannes