From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: 1.5.4-rc2 plans Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:26:51 +0100 Message-ID: <476B6ABB.6040009@viscovery.net> References: <7vwsr8lwf7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 21 08:27:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J5cI4-0004H3-B6 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:27:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751700AbXLUH07 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:26:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752075AbXLUH06 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:26:58 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:15169 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751651AbXLUH06 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:26:58 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1J5cHi-0006op-12; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:27:07 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8ED96EF; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:26:51 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <7vwsr8lwf7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano schrieb: > * Should "git stash" stop doing anything useful? I think the patch > from Nana today may be a reasonable compromise, although I still > think fundamentally different behaviour for the same command > configurable per-user is not very nice (we have precedent in "git > clean" already, though, but "git clean" is inherently dangerous > command, and "git stash" is much more useful and the issue impacts > more people). IMO we should give in and play the safe game. For those who don't like to type "git stash save" can always git config --global alias.shelve "stash save" git config --global alias.unshelve "stash apply" and retrain the fingers. -- Hannes