From: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@redhat.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-am: Run git gc only once and not for every patch.
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:08:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <477EA06A.5090606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhchtjphk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>>
>>> With "too many unreachable loose objects" git gc --auto will always
>>> trigger. This clutters the output of git am and thus git rebase.
>>>
>>> The work flow of the Wine project doesn't include git merge. git rebase
>>> is therefor used to track the origin. This will produce soon too many
>>> loose objects for git gc --auto's taste. Pruning the repository would
>>> "fix" it. But we tell Wine developers new to git to NOT prune as long as
>>> they aren't confident enough with git; just as a safety net in case they
>>> have thrown away month of work.
>> The safety is the reflog. What it refers to doesn't get pruned.
>
> What Nico said.
Not sure if you read my reply to Nico but the reflog is not there for
deleted branches. Nor for a cleared stash. Common operations where one
can loose work by mistake.
> More importantly, ones who are not confident with git would not
> be able to resurrect unreachables that are left unpruned anyway.
> The unreachables are by definition not connected to anything, so
> they cannot do much better than grepping through droppings left
> by "fsck --lost-found", which they probably even do not know how
> to do yet.
The smarter ones come and ask on irc. We helped a few people with git
problems on the Wine channels. Depending on the amount of time someone
put into his "lost" work grepping through "fsck --lost-found" might be
well worth it.
Nevertheless is there a reason why git gc needs to run after applying
each patch in git-am? Why can't it run just once at the end? git prune
is optional and there's no reason to penalize a user that doesn't feel
safe to run it by cluttering the output of git am/rebase. There is also
a time penalty: git gc --auto on a pruned tree runs so fast that it
isn't measurable but on my unpruned wine it took 1.5 seconds. Waiting
1.5 seconds per am/rebase is acceptable; wasting 1.5 seconds per patch
in the mailbox/rebase isn't that much fun if there are more than a
handful of patches to apply.
bye
michael
--
Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199
Consulting Communications Engineer Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH, Hauptstätter Strasse 58, 70178 Stuttgart
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 153243
Geschäftsführer: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham,
Werner Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-04 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-04 18:59 [PATCH] git-am: Run git gc only once and not for every patch Michael Stefaniuc
2008-01-04 19:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-01-04 20:21 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2008-01-04 20:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-01-04 20:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-04 21:08 ` Michael Stefaniuc [this message]
2008-01-04 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-05 6:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-05 16:23 ` Michael Stefaniuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=477EA06A.5090606@redhat.com \
--to=mstefani@redhat.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).