From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] parse_commit_buffer: don't parse invalid commits Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:32:59 +0100 Message-ID: <478C61AB.2040103@viscovery.net> References: <12003456313661-git-send-email-mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Koegler X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 15 08:33:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JEgIi-0000K5-Ei for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:33:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752369AbYAOHdI (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:33:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752388AbYAOHdH (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:33:07 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:21741 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751733AbYAOHdG (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:33:06 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1JEgI3-000867-Ur; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:32:56 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70074E4; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:32:59 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <12003456313661-git-send-email-mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_95=3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin Koegler schrieb: > Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler Quite a lot has been said about this change and you had a hard time defending it. Why doesn't *anything* of that discussion end up in the commit message? The absolute minimum that belongs there is your definition of "invalid commit". -- Hannes