From: Adam Piatyszek <ediap@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-send-email.perl: check for lines longer than 998 characters
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:37:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47908150.9040201@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v1w8fh2ef.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
* Junio C Hamano [18 I 2008 11:08]:
> Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> writes:
>> Then git-format-patch and log-family with --pretty=email -p could warn
>> about these candidates-to-be-broken patches.
>
> I'd rather not, unless it is explicitly asked for by a separate
> command line option. Transferring over SMTP is not the only
> (nor even primary) use of format-patch output.
Agree.
> On the other hand, git-send-email _is_ all about SMTP transfer.
> Perhaps a loop over input files upfront to check the line length
> limit, and warn if there are suspiciously long lines even before
> sending the first piece of e-mail out, would be a reasonable
> approach.
But what next? Still send the problematic patches not encoded?
In my opinion, it is more reasonable to provide an optional encoding of
such patches. And only throw a warning message that some of the patches
had to be encoded. Then, we would not need an extra loop over all patches.
As git-send-email _is_ all about SMTP transfer, we should be interested
that the stuff we transfer is sent correctly.
/Adam
--
.:. Adam Piatyszek (ediap) .:.....................................:.
.:. ediap@users.sourceforge.net .:................................:.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-18 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-17 10:10 [BUG] git send-email brakes patches with very long lines Adam Piatyszek
2008-01-17 13:13 ` Adam Piatyszek
2008-01-17 13:26 ` Adam Piatyszek
2008-01-17 15:32 ` Jeff King
2008-01-18 7:47 ` [PATCH] git-send-email.perl: check for lines longer than 998 characters Adam Piątyszek
2008-01-18 8:12 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-01-18 9:42 ` Adam Piatyszek
2008-01-18 10:01 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-01-18 10:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-18 10:37 ` Adam Piatyszek [this message]
2008-01-18 11:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-18 14:16 ` Jeff King
2008-01-18 14:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] send-email: detect invocation errors earlier Jeff King
2008-01-18 14:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] send-email: validate patches before sending anything Jeff King
2008-01-18 15:09 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-01-18 19:09 ` Jeff King
2008-01-18 17:39 ` Jay Soffian
2008-01-18 19:12 ` Jeff King
2008-01-18 14:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] send-email: add no-validate option Jeff King
2008-01-18 20:57 ` [PATCH] git-send-email.perl: check for lines longer than 998 characters Junio C Hamano
2008-01-18 21:30 ` Jeff King
2008-01-20 22:35 ` Adam Piatyszek
2008-01-20 22:53 ` Jeff King
2008-01-21 10:21 ` Adam Piatyszek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47908150.9040201@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=ediap@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).