From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: git-clean buglet Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:24:01 +0100 Message-ID: <47975C11.7050800@viscovery.net> References: <479759EC.4010002@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 23 16:26:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JHhT8-0000k6-Ma for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:25:19 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751759AbYAWPYG (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:24:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752416AbYAWPYF (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:24:05 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:64016 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751535AbYAWPYE (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:24:04 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1JHhSB-0006CI-Jz for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:23:52 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C63D54D for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:24:01 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <479759EC.4010002@viscovery.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt schrieb: > Try this in your favorite git repo: > > git clean -n / > > Here, it responds with: > > fatal: oops in prep_exclude > > I don't know what the expected behavior should be, but certainly not this. > Maybe just do nothing like 'git ls-files /'. Well, 'git ls-files -o /' would be more similar, but that one lists the entire disk contents - not what I would have expected, either. Hmm... -- Hannes