From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: Any tricks for speeding up cvsps? Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:33:26 +0100 Message-ID: <47AC2FF6.1030103@viscovery.net> References: <47AC1FDC.9000502@glidos.net> <47AC2775.5090403@viscovery.net> <47AC2AC3.6020704@glidos.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Gardiner X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 08 11:34:19 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JNQYh-0005qx-6R for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:34:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934564AbYBHKda (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:33:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934562AbYBHKd3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:33:29 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:23150 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934370AbYBHKd2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:33:28 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1JNQXZ-0002rA-Id; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:33:05 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61571A33B; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:33:26 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <47AC2AC3.6020704@glidos.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Paul Gardiner schrieb: > Johannes Sixt wrote: >> I've used fast-export (not git-fast-export) to convert a CVS repository: >> >> http://repo.or.cz/w/fast-export.git >> >> It worked better than git-cvsimport because the repository was a real >> mess. > > That looks to require going either via svn or mercurial. Is that right? > And if so, which did you find best? You are right. Because I'm utterly confused. I actually used fromcvs/togit: http://ww2.fs.ei.tum.de/~corecode/hg/fromcvs Please bear with me; I did this about a year ago. Sorry for the noise. Be warned that fromcvs/togit does not convert tags. -- Hannes