From: Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
msysGit <msysgit@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: '.git file' alternative, native (cross-platform) workdir support.
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:51:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C81C08.2060608@trolltech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802291333310.22527@racer.site>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1958 bytes --]
Johannes Schindelin said the following on 29.02.2008 15:25:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Marius Storm-Olsen wrote:
>> I'm actually not sure that it's impossible to make it safe. My
>> implementation works by redirecting files into the real repo.
>> However, we can also detect when redirection is in effect, and do
>> extra 'maintainance' things then, to avoid the bad effects.
>
> From the perspective of Windows, I guess it is easy to overlook the
> fact that permissions can break your idea.
>
> Even after creating a second working tree for an existing
> repository, the permissions of the original repository can change.
Sure, but that would break _any_ working tree implementation. Without
access to the original data, it whole thing is bust, no matter if you
redirect all or part of .git/.
Checking if we have access to the redirected .git is trivial in both
cases. (partial or whole redirection)
> The only way to be on the safe side is to use _the repository_
> twice. IOW not having a second .git/ directory.
>
> Also, having a single .git is just a very simple, and thus
> preferable concept, to having part of this, and part of that
> repository.
I whole heartedly agree. I'm not proposing to keep it split in the
long run. I'm just proposing something that 'works' *now*, and can be
improved incrementally; as opposed to, doesn't work now, and needs to
be fully implemented before it works for the Windows crowd.
PS. The redirection method I propose already alleviates an issue of
the current git-new-workdir has, which Shawn has experienced many
atime: The deletion of .git/config and .git/packed-refs, making
'git-config' and 'git tag -d' unsafe in a workdir. (Though I'm unsure
if that has been fixed already. In any case, since the files are
really redirected, there no chance that deleting a file will remove a
synlink, only to be recreated as a normal file instead)
--
.marius
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 187 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-29 12:27 '.git file' alternative, native (cross-platform) workdir support Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-02-29 12:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-29 13:24 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-02-29 14:14 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-02-29 14:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-29 14:51 ` Marius Storm-Olsen [this message]
2008-02-29 20:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-29 21:32 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C81C08.2060608@trolltech.com \
--to=marius@trolltech.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msysgit@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).