From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] tr portability fixes Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:32:37 +0100 Message-ID: <47D8D895.4030309@viscovery.net> References: <20080312212957.GB26286@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Whit Armstrong , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 13 08:33:21 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZhwG-000717-1I for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:33:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751139AbYCMHcl (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:32:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751246AbYCMHcl (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:32:41 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:3790 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750924AbYCMHck (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:32:40 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1JZhuq-0000fJ-TI; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:31:53 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECFF6B7; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:32:37 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <20080312212957.GB26286@coredump.intra.peff.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_80=2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King schrieb: > We can mostly get around this by just using the bracket form > for both sets, as in: > > tr '[A-Z] '[a-z]' > > in which case POSIX interpets this as "'[' becomes '['", > which is OK. > > However, this doesn't work with multiple sequences, like: > > # rot13 > tr '[A-Z][a-z]' '[N-Z][A-M][n-z][a-m]' Not that it matters a lot, but I wonder whether tr '[A-M][N-Z][a-m][n-z]' '[N-Z][A-M][n-z][a-m]' would have done the trick. -- Hannes