From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Newall Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:04:59 +0930 Message-ID: <480565D3.6000100@davidnewall.com> References: <47FEADCB.7070104@rtr.ca> <517f3f820804150254w491cdf85s28f1d15696db8d96@mail.gmail.com> <4804B5D5.4090404@davidnewall.com> <200804152251.51308.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Kerrisk , James Morris , Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Willy Tarreau , david@lang.hm, Stephen Clark , Evgeniy Polyakov , Tilman Schmidt , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Mark Lord , David Miller , jesper.juhl@gmail.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel , git@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 16 06:58:20 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: linux-netdev-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlxUz-0002U0-Ro for linux-netdev-2@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:35:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754043AbYDPCfF (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:35:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753891AbYDPCfD (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:35:03 -0400 Received: from eth7959.sa.adsl.internode.on.net ([150.101.82.22]:33211 "EHLO hawking.rebel.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752951AbYDPCfB (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:35:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.9] (ppp121-45-78-167.lns10.adl6.internode.on.net [::ffff:121.45.78.167]) (AUTH: PLAIN davidn, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by hawking.rebel.net.au with esmtp; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:04:57 +0930 id 0039448E.480565D2.000043D7 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) In-Reply-To: <200804152251.51308.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, even if someone introduces bugs relatively frequently, but then also > works with the reporters and fixes the bugs timely, it's about okay IMO. > This really is not okay. Even if bugs are fixed a version or two later, the impact those bugs have on users makes the system look bad and drives them away. We do not, I believe, want Linux to top the list for "most bugs". It's unprofessional, unreliable and quite undesirable.