From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: git remote update -> rejected
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:26:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480E03A9.3040401@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0804221607190.4460@eeepc-johanness>
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>>>> Okay, how about this: take Peff's patch, but add a warning if
>>>> --mirror is used on a non-bare repository?
>>> Sounds good to me. Indeed, giving a warning is _very_ good idea as
>>> --mirror is potentially, even likely, destructive with local changes
>>> and working directory.
>> What about changing --mirror to add a push line instead of a fetch line?
>
> I would not expect --mirror to add a push line when "git-remote add"
> without --mirror does not a push line either.
Let me reverse the question. When does it make sense to use "git-remote
add --mirror" with the current implementation?
It's not a rhetoric question. I know when it would make sense to have
push refspecs on a remote for which you plan to use "git push --mirror"
(and in "next", that is the case if you create the remote with
"git-remote add --mirror"). But I'm a total newbie for things that do
not fit my workflows, so I don't know when it would make sense to pull
from that kind of remote.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-22 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-22 9:48 git remote update -> rejected Mike Galbraith
2008-04-22 10:34 ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 10:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-22 11:11 ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 11:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 12:56 ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 13:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 13:09 ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 13:26 ` [PATCH] builtin-remote: resurrect forced updates to tracked branches Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 17:00 ` git remote update -> rejected Junio C Hamano
2008-04-22 12:41 ` Teemu Likonen
2008-04-22 12:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 13:01 ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 13:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 13:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 13:39 ` Teemu Likonen
2008-04-22 13:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 14:04 ` Teemu Likonen
2008-04-22 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 15:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 15:26 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2008-04-22 16:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 16:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 16:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-22 17:23 ` [PATCH] remote add: disallow --master and --mirror with non-bare repositories Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 18:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 18:46 ` [PATCH] remote add: disallow --master and --mirror with non-bare repositories (review) Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 22:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=480E03A9.3040401@gnu.org \
--to=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).