git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: git remote update -> rejected
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:26:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <480E03A9.3040401@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0804221607190.4460@eeepc-johanness>

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
>>>> Okay, how about this: take Peff's patch, but add a warning if 
>>>> --mirror is used on a non-bare repository?
>>> Sounds good to me. Indeed, giving a warning is _very_ good idea as 
>>> --mirror is potentially, even likely, destructive with local changes 
>>> and working directory.
>> What about changing --mirror to add a push line instead of a fetch line?
> 
> I would not expect --mirror to add a push line when "git-remote add" 
> without --mirror does not a push line either.

Let me reverse the question.  When does it make sense to use "git-remote 
add --mirror" with the current implementation?

It's not a rhetoric question.  I know when it would make sense to have 
push refspecs on a remote for which you plan to use "git push --mirror" 
(and in "next", that is the case if you create the remote with 
"git-remote add --mirror").  But I'm a total newbie for things that do 
not fit my workflows, so I don't know when it would make sense to pull 
from that kind of remote.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-22 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-22  9:48 git remote update -> rejected Mike Galbraith
2008-04-22 10:34 ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 10:55   ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-22 11:11     ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 11:58       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 12:56         ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 13:03           ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 13:09             ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 13:26               ` [PATCH] builtin-remote: resurrect forced updates to tracked branches Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 17:00         ` git remote update -> rejected Junio C Hamano
2008-04-22 12:41       ` Teemu Likonen
2008-04-22 12:56         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 13:01           ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 13:05             ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 13:53               ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 13:39           ` Teemu Likonen
2008-04-22 13:49             ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 14:04               ` Teemu Likonen
2008-04-22 14:10                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 15:08                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 15:26                     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2008-04-22 16:23                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 16:42                         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 16:50           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-22 17:23             ` [PATCH] remote add: disallow --master and --mirror with non-bare repositories Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-22 18:45               ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 18:46               ` [PATCH] remote add: disallow --master and --mirror with non-bare repositories (review) Paolo Bonzini
2008-04-22 22:04                 ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=480E03A9.3040401@gnu.org \
    --to=bonzini@gnu.org \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).