From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brandon Casey Subject: Re: git gc & deleted branches Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 16:53:20 -0500 Message-ID: <48237650.5060008@nrlssc.navy.mil> References: <20080508183926.GA30613@sigill.intra.peff.net> <48235D99.2040407@nrlssc.navy.mil> <20080508210125.GC32762@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080508211734.GA819@sigill.intra.peff.net> <48236F69.2060900@nrlssc.navy.mil> <20080508213107.GA1016@sigill.intra.peff.net> <48237344.6070405@nrlssc.navy.mil> <20080508214454.GA1939@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Guido Ostkamp , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 08 23:54:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JuE4G-0000Nj-Kh for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 08 May 2008 23:54:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757805AbYEHVxf (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 17:53:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761454AbYEHVxf (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 17:53:35 -0400 Received: from mail1.nrlssc.navy.mil ([128.160.35.1]:48449 "EHLO mail.nrlssc.navy.mil" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757805AbYEHVxe (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 17:53:34 -0400 Received: from starfish.gems.nrlssc.navy.mil (starfish.nrlssc.navy.mil [128.160.50.76]) by mail.nrlssc.navy.mil (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m48LrKXJ030668; Thu, 8 May 2008 16:53:20 -0500 Received: from tick.nrlssc.navy.mil ([128.160.25.48]) by starfish.gems.nrlssc.navy.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 8 May 2008 16:53:20 -0500 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) In-Reply-To: <20080508214454.GA1939@sigill.intra.peff.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2008 21:53:20.0935 (UTC) FILETIME=[EE5B3370:01C8B155] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 04:40:20PM -0500, Brandon Casey wrote: > >> The 'prune --expire' behavior is based on object mtime (i.e. file >> modification time). That is lost once something is packed right? > > Yes. You would have to use the pack mtime. But of course you would have > to actually _leave_ them in a pack, or they would just keep getting > added to the new pack. I had the impression that unreachable objects would not be packed. Maybe it was more of an assumption. -brandon