From: "Florian Köberle" <FloriansKarten@web.de>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [JGIT PATCH v2 14/24] Added the class IgnoreRuleListFactory.
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:19:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48296B41.9020105@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080513010844.GE29038@spearce.org>
Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> Florian Koeberle <florianskarten@web.de> wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * This class can be used to create lists of {@link Rule} objects from lines of
>> + * .gitignore like files.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +class IgnoreRuleListFactory {
>> +
>> + List<Rule> createIgnoreRuleList(Iterable<String> lineIterable) {
>> + LinkedList<Rule> rules = new LinkedList<Rule>();
>> + for (String line : lineIterable) {
>> + final String trimmedLine = line.trim();
>> + if (trimmedLine.startsWith("#")) {
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + if (trimmedLine.length() == 0) {
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + rules.add(0, createRule(trimmedLine));
>> + }
>> + return rules;
>> + }
>> +
>> + List<Rule> createIgnoreRuleList(List<File> files)
>> + throws FileNotFoundException {
>> + final List<String> lines = new ArrayList<String>();
>> + for (File file : files) {
>> + Scanner scanner = new Scanner(file);
>> + try {
>> + while (scanner.hasNextLine()) {
>> + lines.add(scanner.nextLine());
>> + }
>> + } finally {
>> + scanner.close();
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return createIgnoreRuleList(lines);
>> + }
>
> Why go through all this work to buffer the lines we don't care about
> (starting with # or are blank) when we could just discard them in the
> inside of createIgnoreRuleList and then create the rule right away?
I did this to reduce complexity and to increase modularity.
The method createIgnoreRuleList(Iterable<String> lineIterable) can now
be tested without the need to create files. Also it is so possible to
read the patterns from different sources.
If you worry about memory usuage I could create some kind of
RulesBuilder class:
public class RulesBuilder {
private final List<Rule> rules;
private RuleListToObjectConverter converter;
// method used by tests:
public void addIgnoreRule(String ignoreRuleLine) {
}
public void addIgnoreRuleFile(File) {
// reads file and calls addIgnoreRule
}
public void addIncludeRuleOfAddCommand(String pattern) {
}
public void addIgnoreGitDirectoryRule() {
}
public Rules buildRules() {
return converter.convertToObject(rules);
}
}
This would have the advantages:
* all Rule creating code at one place.
* There is no need to keep the original lines in memory.
* It's easy to create rules for testing purposes.
* It's easy to create Factories like AddRulesFactory.
>
>> + private Rule createRule(String trimmedLine) {
>> + final boolean exclude;
>> + String patternString;
>> + if (trimmedLine.startsWith("!")) {
>> + exclude = false;
>> + patternString = trimmedLine.substring(1);
>> + } else {
>> + exclude = true;
>> + patternString = trimmedLine;
>> + }
>
> I suspect this code would be easier to follow if you just accepted
> changing the method parameter, such as:
>
> private Rule createRule(String pattern) {
> boolean exclude = true;
> if (pattern.startsWith("!)) {
> pattern = pattern.substring(1);
> exclude = false;
> }
If I remember correctly Intellij IDEA marks per default cases where you
change a parameter. So it looks like that there are style guides which
are against the practice of changing the values of parameters.
That and the fact that you can't make exclude final now where the reason
why I wrote it the otherway.
>
>> + final boolean matchDirectoriesOnly;
>> + if (patternString.endsWith("/")) {
>> + matchDirectoriesOnly = true;
>> + patternString = patternString.substring(0,
>> + patternString.length() - 1);
>> + } else {
>> + matchDirectoriesOnly = false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + final FilePattern pattern;
>> + if (patternString.contains("/")) {
>> + if (patternString.startsWith("/")) {
>> + patternString = patternString.substring(1);
>> + }
>
> "foo/bar" will always end up in this code-path and will not match
> in all levels of the tree if I follow your code correctly.
>
> An ignore rule in the top level of "foo/bar" should ignore any entry
> named "bar" within a directory "foo" at any level of the tree, even
> if it is 35 directories down from the root. Isn't ComplexFilePattern
> about the absolute (starts with "/") cases only?
Yes, ComplexFilePattern is about that cases only.
I implemented it that way, becasue git behave the same way:
* create the follwing file: a/a/b/test.txt
* add the line "a/b" to .gitignore
* add a and notice that it adds the test.txt file.
>
>> + final StringTokenizer stringTokenizer = new StringTokenizer(
>> + patternString, "/");
>> + final List<String> patternList = new ArrayList<String>();
>> + while (stringTokenizer.hasMoreTokens()) {
>> + final String token = stringTokenizer.nextToken();
>> + patternList.add(token);
>> + }
>
> StringTokenizer is more-or-less replaced by String.split("/"), with
> the split method being the more preferred method of doing this.
>
Ok
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-12 20:13 [JGIT PATCH v2 0/24] Implementation of a file tree iteration using ignore rules Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 01/24] Start of an implementation of a git like command line tool Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 02/24] Formatted Repository class Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 03/24] Formatted Constats class Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 04/24] Added path related constats to " Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 23:54 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-23 15:46 ` Florian Köberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 05/24] Added WorkTree class which can be constructed over Repository Florian Koeberle
2008-05-13 0:04 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-13 21:13 ` Robin Rosenberg
2008-05-14 0:35 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 06/24] Added a "init" command to the git like command line tool Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 07/24] Added findWorkTree method to Repository class Florian Koeberle
2008-05-13 0:24 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-23 18:12 ` Florian Köberle
2008-05-23 18:31 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-05-23 20:39 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-23 21:28 ` Robin Rosenberg
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 08/24] Added the interface FilePattern Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 09/24] Added the class Rule Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 10/24] Added the iterface Rules Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 11/24] Added the class FNMatchPattern Florian Koeberle
2008-05-13 0:38 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 12/24] Added the class GlobalFilePattern Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 13/24] Added the class ComplexFilePattern Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 14/24] Added the class IgnoreRuleListFactory Florian Koeberle
2008-05-13 1:08 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-13 10:19 ` Florian Köberle [this message]
2008-05-14 1:06 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 15/24] Added a Rules interface implementation and a factory for it Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 16/24] Added test class OverallIgnoreRulestest Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 17/24] Added the class TreeFilePattern Florian Koeberle
2008-05-13 1:22 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 18/24] Added InvalidPatternException and PathNotInProjectDirectoryException Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 19/24] Added the class AddRuleListFactory Florian Koeberle
2008-05-13 1:29 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-13 11:24 ` Florian Köberle
2008-05-13 20:55 ` Robin Rosenberg
2008-05-14 1:49 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 20/24] Added class AddRulesFactory Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 21/24] Added the class LightFileTreeIterator and a test for it Florian Koeberle
2008-05-14 14:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 22/24] Added class LightFileTreeIterable Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 23/24] Added the test class AddCommandIterationTest Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:13 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 24/24] Added a "add" command to the git like command line tool Florian Koeberle
2008-05-12 20:43 ` [JGIT PATCH v2 0/24] Implementation of a file tree iteration using ignore rules Miklos Vajna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48296B41.9020105@web.de \
--to=florianskarten@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).