From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep committer and committer dates Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:10:50 +0200 Message-ID: <4847917A.2050700@viscovery.net> References: <20080604102906.GA2126@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20080605010330.GB24466@leksak.fem-net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Jaroslav Kysela , git@vger.kernel.org To: Stephan Beyer X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 05 09:11:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K49dW-0007Ex-L6 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:11:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752252AbYFEHK6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 03:10:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752235AbYFEHK6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 03:10:58 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:54433 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752127AbYFEHK5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 03:10:57 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1K49cZ-0006HJ-HR; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:10:54 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD476B7; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:10:50 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin schrieb: > Hi, > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Stephan Beyer wrote: > >>> - as has been pointed out several times now, you _are_ the committer, >>> and you seem to want to lie there. >> Lying is already possible with GIT_COMMITTER_{NAME,EMAIL,NAME} >> environment variables. > > Of course it is possible! I even pointed to a method! > > The _point_ was that we do not want to recommend it. And giving prominent > support for it, such as introducing a command line parameter, _would_ > have the effect of recommending it. Furthermore, if you mess with committer dates, you can screw up revision walking to some degree. committer dates aren't merely informational. -- Hannes