From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rene Herman Subject: Re: "git pull . " versus "git merge " Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:00:34 +0200 Message-ID: <48507532.3030007@keyaccess.nl> References: <484F2174.9020508@keyaccess.nl> <7v3anjbmov.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 12 03:01:30 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K6bBr-0000tq-OB for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:01:24 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753256AbYFLBAa (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:00:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752925AbYFLBA3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:00:29 -0400 Received: from smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl ([213.51.146.200]:56133 "EHLO smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751502AbYFLBA3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:00:29 -0400 Received: from [213.51.146.188] (port=46176 helo=smtp3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl) by smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6bAx-0007MO-R6; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:00:27 +0200 Received: from cc334381-b.groni1.gr.home.nl ([82.73.12.33]:54767 helo=[192.168.0.3]) by smtp3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6bAx-000566-D1; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:00:27 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) In-Reply-To: <7v3anjbmov.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 12-06-08 01:01, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Rene Herman writes: >> The manpages seem to be making somewhat of a point of mentioning "git >> pull . " as the way to merge a local branch into the current >> one but a simple "git merge " seems to work well. Is there a >> difference? > > There isn't any. > > "git pull . this_branch" is just a natural and logical consequence that > you can fetch and merge a branch B from remote U with "git pull $U $B". > > "git merge that_branch" exists and useful because people on average merge > local branches more than they fetch and merge from remote repository. Thank you. Slowly getting more comfortable with git... Rene.