From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-push: add a --delete flag to allow branch deletion Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:30:40 +0200 Message-ID: <485ADE10.7070404@op5.se> References: <1213884787-24692-1-git-send-email-pdebie@ai.rug.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git Mailinglist , Junio C Hamano To: Pieter de Bie X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 20 00:31:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K9SfM-0002MJ-O8 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:31:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752798AbYFSWao (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:30:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752735AbYFSWao (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:30:44 -0400 Received: from mail.op5.se ([193.201.96.20]:39855 "EHLO mail.op5.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751970AbYFSWan (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:30:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6811B8004E; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:28:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_NONE=0.1] Received: from mail.op5.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.op5.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D4em28OErkoj; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:28:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from clix.int.op5.se (unknown [172.27.78.26]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213191B80046; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:28:01 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) In-Reply-To: <1213884787-24692-1-git-send-email-pdebie@ai.rug.nl> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pieter de Bie wrote: > While this is already possible with the : refspec syntax, > a flag specifically for this action is more userfriendly. > I like it. I always have to tell my co-workers which side of the colon the branch-name to delete should be on. Since they want the remote to lose the branch, it seems logical to some of them to make that side empty. This would make one (very small) headache of mine go away. Question though; does it delete the currently checked out branch if no branch-name is given? I'd prefer if one has to explicitly name the branch to delete. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231