From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lea Wiemann Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] gitweb: Extend project_index file format by project description Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:29:58 +0200 Message-ID: <485D1E76.6090709@gmail.com> References: <200806211540.58929.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 21 17:31:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KA53O-0000fH-Gx for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:31:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751144AbYFUPaF (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:30:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751122AbYFUPaF (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:30:05 -0400 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.190]:2650 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751101AbYFUPaD (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:30:03 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so1663769fkq.5 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:29:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=ZhVvP0+kkHIVy6/fB6VSnTibjIsOYyftpsBlEXd1wg8=; b=D6Kt/ZpiNwNnZ76r5i0QNNVapUDs86i2bcV2PIO1Q8yoSohbIpDLxlONxwneFXsIla aSCnx7UqUvK00MQlkaQjfhQCgq+sV7GtZgn19SWBxNATFNrZL60mYE+QWsyafGU0oI2Q rCCOOv/0MS15/nPqb/13loqgpgxlTix5r/bOk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=hEfGwlmuu+ya7xQTvxeoyH4QJ6S/+KHAoqXMeg0HTZAutQqdy/YA8dWSHtaOYwjenJ mkFb/nrjctYgPyqdqd/XLgOD28wTvZFHh1gA6uzuCBx0dyvlQ7dbGzUZg+2r4TSHtu2m W8kMLJ9qiy6/KwXHezDDzDSlVJ9UjSZhKNsQs= Received: by 10.78.148.15 with SMTP id v15mr2027125hud.37.1214062198852; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.16.30.128? ( [91.33.251.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 35sm4751960huc.37.2008.06.21.08.29.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:29:58 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080421 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <200806211540.58929.jnareb@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski wrote: > This is an RFC mainly because I don't know if it wouldn't conflict > with Lea Wiemann work on adding caching support to gitweb; If you're talking about merge conflicts, it applies fine on my current working copy. (There's trailing whitespace on the "@pr_info =" line, by the way.) > The goal is to first, improve performance; and second, to be possible > to have single place for all info (well, amost all info) needed to > generate projects list. I'm not sure if I understand your objective correctly. If this is exclusively about performance, may I suggest you wait with this till I have implemented caching? Regenerating the project list might end up being fast enough that it won't matter at all; so no reason to complicate the code. If it's about the convenience of maintaining project descriptions in a central place, sure, that's fine. -- Lea