From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reini Urban Subject: Re: [TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed' Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:54:13 +0200 Message-ID: <486126B5.1090909@x-ray.at> References: <20080624163810.GA4654@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 24 19:00:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KBBsm-00064O-GD for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:00:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751473AbYFXQ7o (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:59:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751468AbYFXQ7o (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:59:44 -0400 Received: from mailbackup.inode.at ([213.229.60.24]:35983 "EHLO mailbackup.inode.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751358AbYFXQ7n (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:59:43 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 315 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:59:43 EDT Received: from [62.99.145.5] (port=51247 helo=mx.inode.at) by mailbackup.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KBBml-0007Lv-Gj for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:54:27 +0200 Received: from [212.183.60.88] (port=4929 helo=[10.0.0.5]) by smartmx-05.inode.at with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1KBBli-0008Up-1N for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:53:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 In-Reply-To: <20080624163810.GA4654@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King schrieb: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:17:18PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> When you look for a fix instead of a regression, it can be quite hard >> to twist your brain into choosing the correct bisect command between >> 'git bisect bad' and 'git bisect good'. >> >> So introduce the commands 'git bisect fixed' and 'git bisect unfixed'. > > Thanks. This just bit me the other day, and I thought of the same > solution. I think it might be worth a "non-toy" patch. Maybe "notfixed" is a better wording than "unfixed".