From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lea Wiemann Subject: Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed' Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:48:40 +0200 Message-ID: <486179C8.2000704@gmail.com> References: <20080624163810.GA4654@sigill.intra.peff.net> <486153DB.3070502@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Haggerty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 25 00:49:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KBHKY-0007sy-5J for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:49:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751621AbYFXWsr (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:48:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751424AbYFXWsr (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:48:47 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:52418 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751273AbYFXWsq (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:48:46 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1270253fgg.17 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:48:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=o5/ZHWaR27aDle/uVTpS5f76y50/FGl7AgRZUEtIJIY=; b=Qifu/lCGN/Vl7RcxkcVJ8UcVSzula2gYJzc1lE0ewr0FMMsWsdl1QtW2cX1UhOzzge T/Ox/O2aeBvcq2vWqwVgUMzCOSVB70pLez2OpEG6ydTnpgrwhSCi/8ZGr5bHTsb1M31J /oQxznPxTz0uQXfo2DXbIRXt0ZRhk1ENTffU0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=g7ukudRCLZsk+Uvg1K4Px3vaWiU0zhw5/rFe2Ra+ZWKK/0kLJ9zxBXpji3CNuykeMJ wpD8sqrwJHn+A1NKS4tL6QZtAJ8CEARCOTYAmAnLJeyuWnTegntHwhm+yoUkWU+jz8jT bw8UoA/6ZOddumKkiVGzp1kXOFuKExV9N3a9g= Received: by 10.86.98.10 with SMTP id v10mr9442278fgb.46.1214347722265; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.16.30.128? ( [91.33.195.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm11773746fgg.9.2008.06.24.15.48.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:48:41 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080421 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <486153DB.3070502@alum.mit.edu> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael Haggerty wrote: > Therefore it should be easy to teach git-bisect to locate either kind of > transition, "bad" -> "good" or "good" -> "bad", depending only on where > the user places the original "good" and "bad" tags. I think this is a good suggestion (though I haven't thought things through). Another idea is to add "old" and "new" (or something like that) as aliases to "good" and "bad", since that's the only semantics that the bisect labels actually seem to have. -- Lea