From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: A Large Angry SCM Subject: Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed' Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:53:07 -0400 Message-ID: <486188E3.10803@gmail.com> References: <20080624163810.GA4654@sigill.intra.peff.net> <486153DB.3070502@alum.mit.edu> <486179C8.2000704@gmail.com> Reply-To: gitzilla@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Haggerty , Johannes Schindelin , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Lea Wiemann X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 25 01:54:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KBILS-000089-Po for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:54:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751770AbYFXXxQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:53:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751953AbYFXXxQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:53:16 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.31]:21900 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751628AbYFXXxP (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:53:15 -0400 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so1115802ywe.1 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:53:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wxIXiO+dRkmhbjXA/KDFWgqo6BXZXmHarX4yZ9pG0T8=; b=j4eH9ZAugu9tFM+IxALoeOsq2ncFbKAPFqvYaw/q+El2eVDDlJxG+45tLaWhIgZNcm P4vlXZAN7FYv+hm4JeXNqVj+0B5sV8BFiepp1L8GSMkzZFmpsrnS4t4grrH2JgYyTKNy VD67RmgM9ts+9kDfO9KqCeRJXyJnSeSGdf20U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oqPciYj+2lOvgcI12ZMVksTQLsfaJJsRBxOozfv9LGp1Y/9SancQpKKMAO4hhujWVD OJ2829ySG1LZ2yVjBu7nNbsXZMFMjnuizBqmmhMImJ9cxZLmWLFq7AAxr4nQ3X+ocR/J iqsY5/wtMq8Gudr7PEu8uVU7jZto4bWMDl+1o= Received: by 10.141.1.2 with SMTP id d2mr15680845rvi.129.1214351593406; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.6? ( [66.177.19.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm160836ywi.1.2008.06.24.16.53.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:53:12 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) In-Reply-To: <486179C8.2000704@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Lea Wiemann wrote: > Michael Haggerty wrote: >> Therefore it should be easy to teach git-bisect to locate either kind of >> transition, "bad" -> "good" or "good" -> "bad", depending only on where >> the user places the original "good" and "bad" tags. > > I think this is a good suggestion (though I haven't thought things > through). Another idea is to add "old" and "new" (or something like > that) as aliases to "good" and "bad", since that's the only semantics > that the bisect labels actually seem to have. "Before" and "After" the "Change" maybe?