From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Hennig Subject: Re: git pull is slow Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:32:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4878A442.6020405@arcor.de> References: <48776169.20705@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Andreas Ericsson To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 12 14:34:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KHeJE-0005w6-5d for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:34:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752704AbYGLMdm (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:33:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752645AbYGLMdm (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:33:42 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:38094 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752573AbYGLMdl (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:33:41 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KHeIF-0004F8-OP for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:33:39 +0000 Received: from dialin-145-254-068-189.pools.arcor-ip.net ([145.254.68.189]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:33:39 +0000 Received: from mailing_list by dialin-145-254-068-189.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:33:39 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-068-189.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, Johannes Schindelin schrieb: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > >> Seems like you're being bitten by a bug we had some months back, >> where the client requested full history for new tag objects. > > I do not think so. I think it is a problem with the pack. The slowness > is already there in the clone, in the resolving phase. Thanks for having a look at this! What does "problem with the pack" mean? Do you think it is a Git problem (client or server side?) or just a misconfiguration? Best regards, Stephan Hennig