git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "\"Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists)\"" <4ux6as402@sneakemail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Standard "git svn init ; git svn fetch" behavior
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:24:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <487C88D0.30609@sneakemail.com> (raw)

Hi,

I've now converted my svn repos to git with

$ git-svn init -T trunk -t tags -b branches file://some/path
$ git svn fetch

Wonderful!

I have two questions about the result:

1) It seems the svn tags were converted into git branches such as 
"tags/mytag". Is that normal?

2) Why does master end up being off of tags/mytag instead of off of trunk?

###################################
Re: 1) It seems the svn tags were converted into git branches such as 
"tags/mytag". Is that normal?
###################################

$ git tag -l
returns nothing and
$ git branch -a
returns all my svn tags as "tags/<tag>" git branches and all my svn 
branches as expected in "the root".

Is that by design? Are there any downsides of creating a script that

foreach $tag ( m|tags/(.*)| ) {
   git tag $tag $tag
   git branch -r -D $tag
}

I'm cool with doing that, I just wanted to know if this is the expected 
behaviour, and/or whether I'll run into trouble later because of a 
wierdly converted subversion repository.


###################################
Re: 2) Why does master end up being off of tags/mytag instead of off of 
trunk?
###################################

I would have expected, that "master" ended up tracking "trunk", and not 
tags/mytag. Why track an obscure tag instead of trunk?

The tail of the fetch:

Successfully followed parent
W: +empty_dir: tags/mytag/probe/userHomedir/foo/cache/zlcache
W: +empty_dir: tags/mytag/probe/userHomedir/foo/pna_menu_items
r7375 = 5d3012afabccd348a5a5b81c5cf28532d324ea1b (tags/mytag)
Checking out files: 100% (2184/2184), done.
Checked out HEAD:
   file:///home/pvm/cm/repos/tags/mytag r7375

("mytag" and "foo" replaced internal identifiers present in real output...)

$ git log --pretty=oneline --decorate -n 1

5d3012afabccd348a5a5b81c5cf28532d324ea1b (refs/remotes/tags/mytag, 
refs/heads/master) Tag mytag

I rectified it with simply

$ git branch -m master old
$ git checkout -b master trunk
$ git branch -d old

Just wondering: Why is this behaviour the default? Is it a bug?

Is there a smarter way to find out what branchpoint was used to create 
"master"? (I'm new to git, and find it difficult to see what my branches 
were "made from")

Peter

-- 
Peter Valdemar Mørch
http://www.morch.com

             reply	other threads:[~2008-07-15 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-15 11:24 "Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists)" [this message]
2008-07-15 14:37 ` Standard "git svn init ; git svn fetch" behavior Peter Harris
2008-07-15 20:14   ` "Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists)"

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=487C88D0.30609@sneakemail.com \
    --to=4ux6as402@sneakemail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).