From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: [RFC] Stopping those fat "What's cooking in git.git" threads Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:27:04 +0200 Message-ID: <48841E28.9050903@op5.se> References: <20080720205125.GP10347@genesis.frugalware.org> <7vsku44679.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Miklos Vajna , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 21 07:29:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKnxa-0004C7-2O for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:29:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753500AbYGUF2W (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:28:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753429AbYGUF2W (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:28:22 -0400 Received: from mail.op5.se ([193.201.96.20]:55584 "EHLO mail.op5.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753269AbYGUF2V (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:28:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176771B8009E; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:29:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_NONE=0.1] Received: from mail.op5.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.op5.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e57YOoeUBYem; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:28:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from clix.int.op5.se (unknown [172.27.78.10]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCF21B80082; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:28:57 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) In-Reply-To: <7vsku44679.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Miklos Vajna writes: > >> So here is what I thought about: What about if everyone (except Junio, >> of course) would change the subject _and_ remove the In-Reply-To: header >> when replying to those mails? >> >> If those large threads just annoys a few people and most people are >> happy with the current situation then sorry for the noise. > > I could make "What's cooking" not a follow-up to the previous issue, or > perhaps add "(volume 1.6.0, issue 28)" at the end of the Subject. > I would very much prefer that (both of them, really). Thunderbird's threading is not so advanced as mutt's, so I can't break threads so easily. The most annoying part is that the timebased auto-delete from thunderbird means I get a new thread spawning in the middle of an old partially deleted one. It can be very confusing. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231