From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix update-index --refresh for submodules if stat(2) returns st_size 0 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:59:47 +0200 Message-ID: <48861203.80106@viscovery.net> References: <20080721173511.GB5387@steel.home> <4885897C.8010401@viscovery.net> <20080722164604.GA3766@blimp.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Riesen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 22 19:00:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KLLEJ-0006hI-9E for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:00:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752307AbYGVQ7w (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:59:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752256AbYGVQ7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:59:51 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:33236 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752146AbYGVQ7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:59:51 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1KLLDH-0004nR-N8; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:59:49 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F986D9; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:59:47 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <20080722164604.GA3766@blimp.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_95=3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alex Riesen schrieb: > Johannes Sixt, Tue, Jul 22, 2008 09:17:16 +0200: >> Alex Riesen schrieb: >>> + if ((changed & DATA_CHANGED) && (ce->ce_size != 0 || S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) >> Does this mean that ce->ce_size is non-zero for gitlinks, at least on >> Unix? > > It is non-zero for directories (which is what gitlinks are in working > directories) on UNIX operating systems I met. > >> Is this value useful in anyway? > > Sometimes it is (the size a directory takes on storage) Sure; but is ce->ce_size of gitlinks useful? -- Hannes