From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Zawirski Subject: Re: [EGIT] Supported Eclipse version Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:12:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4889DF49.3000903@gmail.com> References: <48888A2E.4030302@gmail.com> <89D1384A-403C-4E6E-816C-204AE0AAC30C@yahoo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Robin Rosenberg , "Shawn O. Pearce" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois_Veillette?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 25 16:13:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMO31-000830-7D for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:13:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751100AbYGYOMb convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:12:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750974AbYGYOMb (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:12:31 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]:37877 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750832AbYGYOMa (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:12:30 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so1251499nfc.21 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:12:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c+5cprRdIB1ejZTgVTHRwkuPWIvvSNXQeGPmg2ffzFo=; b=LzrbjHdXan/nguws3klpYqhoI1PZsLu6JsR7pRW13LL21RkqB1N5zklJriye1s8f84 pJDcsogJ3/XDdWinZ+k0JRkaskr06oAv4TMfmcRT2TuGfW/PC5Oby0pSUKvlxobp9f+N yEHcy1OrsXAwj0q6uqfIaHd3aB3zQKTAF+T0c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kfOMZRLSdEKxg4fTpi2XIvbJ2Ez6Dp3MC0n5XamTtlEeUcHpR0Ea5GfDcq9tmlfhbt noRq9aw/6Kk/85F8Ec2YlvV124nD7hGeUlCJwazmLWgSD2px0pv4HPrvi0A6sn2B6yZ8 ghOJ6WjzukxWJXRe7/DdMFU7B5Ga8K2/Vzex4= Received: by 10.210.16.11 with SMTP id 11mr1979095ebp.187.1216995148928; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.167? ( [150.254.6.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f4sm38067762nfh.27.2008.07.25.07.12.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:12:27 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080509) In-Reply-To: <89D1384A-403C-4E6E-816C-204AE0AAC30C@yahoo.ca> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jean-Fran=E7ois Veillette wrote: >> Maybe some users (or developers) from mailing list can tell us about= =20 >> their opinion? > > I think keeping comptability for one version behind the 'current'=20 > (still compatible 3.3 while 3.4 is the current) is a reasonable goal. > 3.2 is relatively far behind, tools vendor had time to get up to date= =20 > by now. > If a user is using a third party version of eclipse based on 3.2, the= n=20 > I guess he should not expect egit to work with it (he should just pra= y=20 > and hope for the best). > > For myself, I use 3.3.x, I have not yet moved to 3.4 since my main=20 > plugin (WOLips) is not ready yet for 3.4. > > - jfv I would also vote for this change. Especially if there are not many=20 users screaming that they need egit in Eclipse 3.2. BTW, I'm using 3.4 version for 2 days and it looks really nice. What's=20 important, it seems to not be that buggy as early 3.3 releases were. Robin, Shawn, would you accept next patches using 3.3 API? Marek