From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make cherry-pick use rerere for conflict resolution. Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:49:33 +0200 Message-ID: <48A0274D.8090504@viscovery.net> References: <1218368935-31124-1-git-send-email-ams@toroid.org> <20080811023053.GA9144@toroid.org> <20080811104006.GH32184@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Petr Baudis , Abhijit Menon-Sen , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 11 13:50:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSVv8-00006E-7u for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:50:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751511AbYHKLtj (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:49:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751505AbYHKLtj (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:49:39 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:11712 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751203AbYHKLti (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:49:38 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1KSVu2-0005Vc-Ay; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:49:34 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137B16EF; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:49:34 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin schrieb: > That would actually be a problem, no? I am not sure that resolutions for > reverts make sense for cherry-picks, so I am not sure if resolutions > should be recorded for reverts. Of course they should. If the reversal is part of a topic branch that you rebase at least once, then you want to have the resolutions recorded, don't you? -- Hannes