From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: pack count on repo.or.cz [was "Medium term dreams"] Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:49:32 +0200 Message-ID: <48BD446C.6020403@viscovery.net> References: <7vsksjsbcc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080902000037.GA11869@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080902010410.GI10360@machine.or.cz> <20080902011433.GA12682@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080902111531.GL10360@machine.or.cz> <20080902115424.GA11303@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080902130801.GN10360@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Baudis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 02 15:50:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KaWHS-0003eO-1n for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:50:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753716AbYIBNtk (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:49:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753692AbYIBNtk (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:49:40 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:16308 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753647AbYIBNtj (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:49:39 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1KaWGE-0002Q7-Go; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:49:35 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF23C6B7; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 15:49:31 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <20080902130801.GN10360@machine.or.cz> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis schrieb: >> As to why the other packs weren't pruned, I don't know. In my example, >> you can see that the pruning happens as we expect. So either there is a >> bug in git-prune-packed, or there is something we're not realizing. > > Well, that's my question here. :-) Does removing all the *.keep files help? ;) -- Hannes