From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] error out if path is invalid Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:02:22 +0200 Message-ID: <48E9B7FE.2000503@viscovery.net> References: <20081005004036.GO21650@dpotapov.dyndns.org> <1223172881-4948-1-git-send-email-dpotapov@gmail.com> <1223172881-4948-2-git-send-email-dpotapov@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Potapov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 06 09:03:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kmk82-0006X1-Tf for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:03:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751327AbYJFHC2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:02:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751256AbYJFHC2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:02:28 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:8341 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751176AbYJFHC2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:02:28 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1Kmk6s-0007tl-78; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:02:26 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863FA4FB; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:02:22 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <1223172881-4948-2-git-send-email-dpotapov@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Dmitry Potapov schrieb: > if (!verify_path(path)) > - return -1; > + return error("Invalid path '%s'", path); Look at this change. Didn't the code error out before, too? Same in the other cases. Hence, your patch subject does not describe the patch. And I'd appreciate if you could at least show an example in the description what the patch fixes. -- Hannes