From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
To: Knut Eldhuset <knut@3d-radar.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Different svn-id URLs in history
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:32:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EC7022.7030707@drmicha.warpmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48EC546F.7060106@3d-radar.com>
Knut Eldhuset venit, vidit, dixit 08.10.2008 08:34:
> Michael J Gruber wrote:
>> Knut Eldhuset venit, vidit, dixit 07.10.2008 12:58:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After cloning my svn repository, I notice that the svn-id URL is
>>> different when going back in history:
>>>
>>> git-svn-id: https://server/trunk@300
>>>
>>> vs
>>>
>>> git-svn-id: https://server/trunk/some_folder/project/src@250
>>>
>> I take this is as an invitation for guesswork (given the amount of
>> details)...
>
> Sorry about that... I'm confused.
>> You probably have commits which don't follow your usual svn repo layout
>> (trunk/some_folder/project/src) but commit to trunk/ directly. The output of
>>
>> svn log -v -r300 https://server/trunk@300
>> svn log -v -r250 https://server/trunk/some_folder/project/src@250
>>
>> should give some clues.
>>
>
> Svn log shows that the same path has been modified in both cases. I see
Does "same path" mean:
- same relative to the above paths or
- same absolute path?
> something strange in git, though. Our svn repository has about 6500
> commits, but git shows over 10.000. Further investigation shows that a
> lot of svn commits have two entries in git. Some branches off of trunk
> do not start at r1, but off of a duplicate rNNNN. Could this be due to
> our unhealthy practice of creating branches off of subtrees in svn? By
> this I mean create a branch off of
> https://server/trunk/some_folder/project/src instead of
> https://server/trunk. If so, what can be done to fix this?
>
> As a sidenote, during git svn clone, I noticed that each time a new
> branch or tag was discovered, the "scanning" started back at r1. Is this
> normal? I would think the history before the branch was already
> imported. Of course, this could maybe be due to the bad branching
> practice described above.
svn is typically "abused" in the sense that one svn repo is used for
separate projects (your subtrees). git-svn can deal with non-standard
repo layouts.
I assume you can't share the svn repo publically, can you?
So, in order to help you, we would need to know
- the layout of your svn repo: where are trunk, branches and tags, how
did you create branches and tags in svn, are "projects" entirely separate
- your incarnation of git-svn
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-08 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-07 10:58 Different svn-id URLs in history Knut Eldhuset
2008-10-07 15:01 ` Michael J Gruber
2008-10-08 6:34 ` Knut Eldhuset
2008-10-08 8:32 ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
2008-10-08 9:20 ` Knut Eldhuset
2008-10-08 9:23 ` Knut Eldhuset
2008-10-09 14:20 ` Michael J Gruber
2008-10-10 8:56 ` Knut Eldhuset
2008-10-09 6:16 ` Knut Eldhuset
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48EC7022.7030707@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--to=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=knut@3d-radar.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).