From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH try 2] t1301-shared-repo.sh: don't let a default ACL interfere with the test
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:10:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F5A590.3050905@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v7i8a47f6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano schrieb:
> Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> writes:
>>> - Do you mean, by "educate users", that we teach users not to play fun
>>> games with ACL in a git controled working tree?
>> Correct. In the case of a shared repository we can educate users not to
>> play with ACLs.
>>
>>> - Do you mean, by "fix the code", that we teach adjust_shared_perm() to
>>> deal with ACL?
>> Correct in principle, but we need not go this route in the case of shared
>> repositories because we better educate users.
>
> If that is the case what difference does your suggestion of not putting it
> in test-lib.sh make? We discourage users from playing ACL games, and we
> protect ourselves from such by making sure the trash directory used for
> running tests are not contaminated with ACL. Wouldn't it make more sense
> to do so for all the tests, so that future test writers do not have to
> worry about it?
We have to decide case by case. In the case of shared directories it makes
sense to suggest "do not play ACL games". In other cases, however, this
suggestion could not work out that well, and a workaround in the code is
the better solutions. But we do not know what those other cases are, and
the test suite may be a tool to uncover them.
Perhaps I'm worrying too much because a case that warrants a change in the
code would either have to happen frequently or be backed with very strong
arguments that ACLs are required in that particular way. (And in both
cases there would still have be conflicts in the way how git handles
permissions - we wouldn't care otherwise.) But no such case has turned up
so far.
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-15 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-14 22:07 [PATCH] t1301-shared-repo.sh: don't let a default ACL interfere with the test Matt McCutchen
2008-10-14 22:10 ` [PATCH try 2] " Matt McCutchen
2008-10-14 22:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-14 23:00 ` Matt McCutchen
2008-10-14 23:45 ` Deskin Miller
2008-10-15 6:13 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-10-15 6:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-15 7:18 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-10-15 7:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-15 8:10 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2008-10-16 5:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-17 2:28 ` Matt McCutchen
2008-10-17 4:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-17 4:33 ` Matt McCutchen
2008-10-17 2:28 ` [PATCH try 3] " Matt McCutchen
2008-10-17 2:32 ` [PATCH try 4] " Matt McCutchen
2008-10-15 14:34 ` [PATCH try 2] " Matt McCutchen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48F5A590.3050905@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=matt@mattmccutchen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).