From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] contrib/hooks/post-receive-email: send individual mails to recipients Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:08:43 +0100 Message-ID: <491B0D9B.7080306@viscovery.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Andy Parkins , Junio C Hamano To: Michael Adam X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 12 18:10:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L0JEL-0005NR-Ip for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:10:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752988AbYKLRIu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:08:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752770AbYKLRIu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:08:50 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:57188 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752621AbYKLRIt (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:08:49 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L0JCu-0002og-Aj; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:08:44 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0606A4E4; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:08:43 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_95=3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael Adam schrieb: > This changes the behaviour of post-receive-email when a list of recipients > (separated by commas) is specified as hooks.mailinglist. With this modification, > an individual mail is sent out for each recipient entry in the list, instead > of sending a single mail with all the recipients in the "To: " field. I don't think this is well-behaved: - The load multiplies for the sender (typically a repository server). - And wouldn't each recipient get a new Message-Id? This would break threading if further communication takes place among the recipients. But I may be wrong on both accounts. -- Hannes