From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
To: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@volumehost.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Grafting mis-aligned trees.
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:24:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492289B0.4010903@drmicha.warpmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811171645.12869.bss03@volumehost.net>
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. venit, vidit, dixit 17.11.2008 23:45:
> I haven't gotten a response from my subscription email, so please CC me on any replies.
>
> So, I've been managaing the source I had from a client project in git and
> have a non-linear history. Currently, two tips (production and testing)
> but there are many feature branches that were git-merge'd in, not rebased.
>
> Now, I've gotten the full tree. Turns out all the source code I was
> working on was in a subdirectory "project/web". I'd like to "graft" the
> *changes* I made onto the full tree.
>
> I figured this might be a job for git-filter-branch. Certainly, that did
> the job of moving all my changes into the subdirectory. But, now I want to
> do something that's a combination or git-rebase and git-filter-branch. I
> want to replay the *patches/deltas* (like rebase) on top of the full tree I
> have, but *maintain the non-liear history* (like filter-branch).
>
> Can anyone think of a recipe for me?
>
> Trees look something like this right now.
>
> <some history> -> FT
>
> TI -> <non-linear history> -> A -> <non-linear history> -> C
> \ \ \
> -> PI ------------------------> B ------------------------> D
>
> I'd like to have it look something like:
>
> <some history> -> FT -> <non-linear history> -> A' -> <non-linear history> -> C'
> \ \ \
> -> PI' ----------------------> B' -----------------------> D'
>
> A', B', C', and D' are different commits, but the diff (and history) between
> FT and A' is the same as the diff (and history) between TI and A.
>
> Again, please CC me on any replies.
[CCing is customary here anyways.]
So, your base directory for TI and FT is different, right? I.e.: In the
TI repo, your project sits at the root, whereas in the FT repo it sits
in project/web? Has FT advanced since you took the initial subdir
snapshot for TI?
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-18 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-17 22:45 Grafting mis-aligned trees Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2008-11-18 9:24 ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
2008-11-28 23:01 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2008-12-02 16:20 ` Michael J Gruber
2008-12-02 17:19 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2008-12-02 17:38 ` Michael J Gruber
2008-12-02 18:28 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492289B0.4010903@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--to=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=bss03@volumehost.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).