From: Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>
To: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Bad git status performance
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:28:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4926009E.4040203@gmx.ch> (raw)
Hi list!
I'm getting bad performance on 'git status' when I have staged
many changes to big files. For example, consider this:
$ git init
Initialized empty Git repository in $HOME/test/.git/
$ for X in $(seq 100); do dd if=/dev/zero of=$X bs=1M count=1 2> /dev/null; done
$ git add .
$ git commit -m 'Lots of zeroes'
Created initial commit ed54346: Lots of zeroes
100 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 1
create mode 100644 10
...
create mode 100644 98
create mode 100644 99
$ for X in $(seq 100); do echo > $X; done
$ time git status
# On branch master
# Changed but not updated:
# (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
#
# modified: 1
# modified: 10
...
# modified: 98
# modified: 99
#
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
real 0m0.003s
user 0m0.001s
sys 0m0.002s
$ git add -u
$ time git status
# On branch master
# Changes to be committed:
# (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
#
# modified: 1
# modified: 10
...
# modified: 98
# modified: 99
#
real 0m16.291s
user 0m16.054s
sys 0m0.221s
The first 'git status' shows the same difference as the second,
just the second time it's staged instead of unstaged. Why does it
take 16 seconds the second time when it's instant the first time?
(Side note: There once was a discussion about adding natural order
of branch names, but seems it never made it into git. The same
would make sense for 'git status' too.)
Cheers,
jlh
next reply other threads:[~2008-11-21 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-21 0:28 Jean-Luc Herren [this message]
2008-11-21 0:42 ` Bad git status performance David Bryson
[not found] ` <c9e534200811201711y887ddd2t33013ec4a7db3c9a@mail.gmail.com>
2008-11-21 12:46 ` Jean-Luc Herren
2008-11-21 15:19 ` Michael J Gruber
2008-11-21 20:07 ` Jean-Luc Herren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4926009E.4040203@gmx.ch \
--to=jlh@gmx.ch \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).