From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael J Gruber Subject: gitsub{module,project} Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:54:54 +0100 Message-ID: <492ACE4E.1090506@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 24 16:56:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L4dnQ-0007tl-Bg for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:56:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752810AbYKXPy6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:54:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752697AbYKXPy6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:54:58 -0500 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:53416 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752774AbYKXPy6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:54:58 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603D81C7656 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:54:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:54:57 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: m/iPjJ5Hrs1ned7MtTJLEnLY919Fn8M4p963s0GTy2W+ 1227542097 Received: from [139.174.44.12] (whitehead.math.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.44.12]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E62B81729F for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:54:56 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081105) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Dear all: Parts of git still use the term subproject rather then submodule. A simple grep/wc -l shows submodule as the winner by 10:1 or so. Are there any objections to consolidating that naming (in favour of submodule)? Michael